<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natasha Alexander &#187; Haven Kimmel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natasha.edcentric.org/tag/haven-kimmel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natasha.edcentric.org</link>
	<description>... is Nancy Drew Too</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:36:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Push and Pull</title>
		<link>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/02/22/push-and-pull/</link>
		<comments>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/02/22/push-and-pull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haven Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.edcentric.org/?p=1300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been reading a lot lately, which means I haven’t been writing a lot lately.  In theory, it seems like it’s a good idea to read a lot in hopes of improving my writing – but for me, it hasn’t worked out that way so much, at least not in the short run.</p>
<p>Part of &#160;&#160;&#160;[<a href="http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/02/22/push-and-pull/">Continue reading</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://natasha.edcentric.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/books-300x299.jpg" alt="books" title="books" width="300" height="299" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1299" />I’ve been reading a lot lately, which means I haven’t been writing a lot lately.  In theory, it seems like it’s a good idea to read a lot in hopes of improving my writing – but for me, it hasn’t worked out that way so much, at least not in the short run.</p>
<p>Part of it, of course, is just time.  If I’m reading a 400+ page novel, I’m not spending a bunch of hours writing.  Duh.</p>
<p>But it’s more than that, I think.  I get cramped up reading something that’s really, really good (like anything by <a href="http://www.havenkimmel.com/HK/Haven_Kimmel.html">Haven Kimmel</a>) and then the self-doubt kicks in more and more and Ms. Internal Editor stands on my computer monitor shouting ‘it’s no good!’ to every word, every sentence I write.  And so I do something else instead – go back to reading my novel, or baking, or even, God forbid, cleaning a bathroom.  (Okay, not <em>that</em> so much.) </p>
<p>I’ve also read a bunch of stuff that feels so-so and I’m being far more critical of it than I used to be, Ms. Editor pulling out her virtual red pen and marking where it could be shortened, expanded, dumped.  So I’m not even enjoying someone else’s breath-taking (or not) writing – I’m just using it as a backdrop to compare it to my own pitiful efforts. And this feels destructive in a number of ways.</p>
<p>Here’s a brief run-down on what I’ve read – or tried to read – in the last month.</p>
<p><em>The Solace of Leaving Early</em> by Haven Kimmel.   Kimmel started out as a poet and that comes across loud and clear in her writing.  Her characters, word choices, the events of the novel are luminous, dreamlike, beautiful.  I’m only sorry I got it from the library instead of owning it because just opening it to any random page and reading is a sumptuous pleasure that I’d like to enjoy every so often.  Very descriptive, evocative, and lots of internal monologue stuff.  It moves along at its own pace, which is often quite slow.  Not necessarily for everyone, but definitely for me.</p>
<p><em>Something Rising (Light and Swift)</em> by Haven Kimmel.  It’s the second book of a loose trilogy (along with <em>Solace</em>) that takes place in small-town Indiana.  Though probably small town anywhere, it has a real southern Gothic feel to me –I can see it happening a lot more easily in North Carolina than in upstate New York (where I did grow up in a distressingly small town – population around 600 and falling…) The book is filled with characters who have spent way too much time being poor, way too much time sinking under the weight of life, living in the kind of town where when we drive through them now I still shudder and feel claustrophobia grab my throat and run away with it. </p>
<p>Cassie, the main character of <em>Something Rising</em>, is seemingly unflappable as she takes care of her unbelievably needy family and friends by hustling pool.   Then someone cuts her off in traffic.  With breathtakingly few words and a short scene, Kimmel shows us that Cassie’s frustrations are there, alive and well and ready to show up at an inopportune moment.  Great, great example of ‘show, don’t tell.’</p>
<p><em>The Used World</em> is the third book in Kimmel’s Indiana trilogy.  It’s sitting on my desk, but I think it’s going to head back to the library unread right now.  I might get more out of it when I’ve taken a Kimmel breather.  And I need to start writing again.</p>
<p>I read <em>The Opposite of Love</em> by Julie Buxbaum somewhere in among the Kimmel books.  It&#8217;s okay, but nothing special.  It felt too yuppie to me, but that might be because I was immersed in Kimmel’s characters and my own characters, and I felt like a stranger in a strange land reading the Buxbaum book.  I didn’t really care about the characters, but maybe it was just a matter of when I read it.</p>
<p>Something, anything, by Nicholas Sparks.  I tried, I really tried.  I opened a bunch of his books to random pages to see if something would grab me.  The writing was so clunky that I simply couldn’t put the books down fast enough.   I understand he is all about story, but writing that clumsy would just get in my way of enjoying the story.  As a side note, Sparks spoke at my local university a couple of weeks ago.  I wanted to go because I was curious to hear him, but the event was sold out days before he spoke.  Apparently most people are able to read his books.</p>
<p><em>The Help</em> by <a href="http://kathrynstockett.com/">Kathryn Stockett.</a>   Another debut novel, hanging around at the top of the best-seller list forever now.  <em>The Help</em> is set in Jackson, MS in 1962, when a privileged young white woman determined to become a writer decides to tell the stories of black maids who work in the homes of privileged young white women.  Given the time and place, it’s hard to believe that these maids would actually put their lives and livelihoods in jeopardy by telling a white woman what working for white families is really like.  Each of the three main characters (the white writer and two black maids) tells her story in first-person POV, which I found an interesting approach but a little disconcerting, especially the dialect that one of the maids uses.  I thought the characters were all pretty much caricatures.  Still, I stayed up until 1 AM last night to finish it.</p>
<p>That’s it.  As you can see, today’s post is yet another endeavor to keep me away from my own little world with Libby, Reed, Earl, Becca and the rest of them, but at least it has my fingers moving across the keyboard and if Ms. Inner Editor is screaming at me, I’m turning down the volume a bit.  (Yes, I realize that I&#8217;ve mixed tenses a fair amount in this post.  And I&#8217;m not gonna fix it.)</p>
<p>I’m feeling like my NaNo novel, and Libby and Reed in particular, are on another train going somewhere else, and I want to get back on the same track.  Do I have to put a moratorium on reading for a while to do that?  </p>
<p>I don’t want to write in a vacuum, but it almost feels like reading is putting a damper on my writing.  Part of it is the time, and part of it is – what?  </p>
<p><strong>How do you handle the pull of reading with the push of writing?  </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/02/22/push-and-pull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m reading now</title>
		<link>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/01/27/what-im-reading-now/</link>
		<comments>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/01/27/what-im-reading-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaNoWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haven Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K.M. Weiland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.edcentric.org/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My local branch library has twice as many books on fly-fishing as it has on writing.  Given my limited choices, I checked out How to Write and Sell Your First Novel by Collier and Leighton.   Here’s # 5 from their “Seven Do&#8217;s” Checklist:  “Do type with a new, black ribbon so &#160;&#160;&#160;[<a href="http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/01/27/what-im-reading-now/">Continue reading</a>]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local branch library has twice as many books on fly-fishing as it has on writing.  Given my limited choices, I checked out <em>How to Write and Sell Your First Novel</em> by Collier and Leighton.   Here’s # 5 from their “Seven Do&#8217;s” Checklist:  “Do type with a new, black ribbon so your manuscript will be attractive and will photocopy well.”</p>
<p>heh heh.</p>
<p>The book isn’t even all that old (1986), but it felt outdated to me.  And after I read their chapter on “Four Steps Are All It Takes” I decided it was not the book for me.  Here are their four steps in planning:</p>
<p>1.	You know what your novel is about.<br />
2.	You write an opening.<br />
3.	You plan and write the ending.<br />
4.	Then, you devise a plot and characters to take you from here to there.  Ideally, you start an outline consisting of pages or folders for each of the flows of action, or chapters.  You have actually started writing!</p>
<p>These are probably reasonable, rational steps, but I haven’t taken any of them (which may be why my NaNoWriMo novel is such a mess) and so the book didn’t resonate with me.   Perhaps I should have read this book, or at least these steps, last October.  To be fair, the authors admit that some writers, like Graham Greene (one of my favorites), allow their characters to lead the way, but their preference is the four-step program.   Do these steps work for any of you?  I think I was way more free form with NaNo than the rest of you.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1080" title="boothdogs" src="http://natasha.edcentric.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/boothdogs1.jpg" alt="boothdogs" width="368" height="400" />By the time I got to Chapter Four, the library had located <em>Self-Editing for Fiction Writers</em> by Browne and King so I moved on to that. I am finding it much more useful.  Plus, I love, love, love George Booth and any book with his cartoons is okay by me.  This one isn&#8217;t in the Browne and King book, but it&#8217;s perfect.</p>
<p>I’m finding myself racing from chapter to chapter, though, and I just need to sit down slowly and try to get some of the ideas to penetrate my brain.  (Uh – is anyone actually doing the exercises at the end of the chapters?  I’ve looked at a couple of them and I’m cool with the quick and dirty ones, but the more time-consuming and probably more beneficial ones I’m passing by for now…. How about you?)</p>
<p>I just finished K.M. Weiland’s e-book, <em>Crafting Unforgettable Characters: A Hands-On Guide to Bringing Your Characters to Life</em>.  It’s available via her <a href="http://wordplay-kmweiland.blogspot.com/">Wordplay: Helping Writers Become Authors</a> blog, and it’s full of useful stuff.  I got some hints on how to make a couple of my characters wake up, and I want to ‘interview’ my characters.  Let’s hope that once they’re pumped up a little, they’ll help me figure out how to fill some of my plot holes.</p>
<p>Weiland has some good advice that we already know, but she says it well:  “We also learn from reading the works of others—both the mind-blowing ones and the mind-numbing ones. As lovers of stories, writers should perforce be avid readers, sucking in all kinds of lessons through sheer osmosis.”</p>
<p>I am currently in the midst of a mind-blowing book: <em>The Solace of Leaving Early</em> by <a href="http://www.havenkimmel.com/HK/Haven_Kimmel.html">Haven Kimmel</a>.  I’m having trouble coming up with a single excerpt to share without copying everything since it’s that good, but fortunately her website includes the first six pages of the book, and introduces one of the main characters, Amos.</p>
<p>Langston, the other main character, has just dropped out of graduate school.  This conversation between Langston and her mother takes place shortly after she’s returned home from school:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“It’s ten o’clock now.  Two hours, Langston.  The funeral is at noon.  You have two hours to grow up.”  She turned around and stomped down the stairs, slamming the attic door behind her.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“Yes, well,” Langston said to her mother, quite a few minutes after she was gone.  “I’d take you a lot more seriously if you ever wore shoes.”</p>
<p>She packs a lot into that quick exchange.</p>
<p>Kimmel seems to break a lot of the rules: she puts a prologue in her first novel, gives lots of character description before anything actually happens, and begins with an interior monologue.  But it all works, and beautifully.  Which means, in part, that we should only pay so much attention to <em>following</em> the rules, and some to <em>breaking</em> them.</p>
<p><em>The Solace of Leaving Early</em> is amazingly, heartbreakingly, heartwarmingly, authentically, eccentrically, breathtakingly lovely and wonderful.</p>
<p>There.  If Haven Kimmel can break the rules, so can I.  Only she does it really well.  And she writes about dogs, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natasha.edcentric.org/2010/01/27/what-im-reading-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

